Quantcast
Channel: Queer Voices
Viewing all 13653 articles
Browse latest View live

My "Reluctant Lesbian" Mother Would Blush at Gay Culture Today

$
0
0
Mama, whom I called a "reluctant lesbian," lived quietly in the shadows of suburbia. If she were alive today, we would have cried together over the Supreme Court's ruling making same sex marriage a constitutional right.

The 5-4 vote was a resounding and powerful example of the shifting climate on gay rights, a shift that has been increasingly reflected in pop culture. Thanks to Netflix's brilliant and explicit new series, Sense8, LGBTQ relationships are squarely in our faces. Unlike the status quo of my mother's generation however, gay, lesbian and transgender couples may never have to hide again.

My mother was shy but passionate, honest to a fault and protective of her privacy. She whispered her way out of the closet when I was 12. Like many of her generation, she did what she was "supposed to" by raising her family, remaining married and quietly suffering.

Though I'm straight (we can save an analysis of my failed marriages and plethora of boyfriends for another time) my mother's personal struggles became my raison d'être for becoming a gay rights and anti-bullying advocate and ally. Mama had always been honest with me about her feelings and identity, and I'd never been embarrassed by or judgmental of her sexual preference. There were no surprises in our life, until the day I shocked my reserved and unsuspecting mother by outing her to a prejudiced and ignorant civics teacher my senior year of high school.

My teacher had been leading our class through a mock legislative process and proposed a bill that included an ill-informed and highly misguided statement equivalent to "children of gay couples tend to become gay." It was his justification for opposing gay marriage.

When it came my time to speak, I looked him squarely in the eye and said: "you probably don't really know any children of a gay or lesbian couple, well guess what -- you're looking at one." KAPOW! Since then, if I ever heard or saw anyone who suffered discrimination or bullying for his or her personal choices and sexual orientation, I'd have something to say about it. To this day I display my Gen-X brazenness with a lot more fanfare than what my mother allowed for herself. What activism she only dared to reveal via a pen name, I share openly in my blog and any outlet that would have me.

But now, thanks to the extreme boundaries being pushed in pop culture today, I wonder how much longer I will even have to stand on my soapbox. People's sexual sensibilities have been pushed waaaayyy further than anything my blogs could do, and if Mama were alive today, she'd be blushing.

If you don't know what I mean, you haven't experienced one of today's hottest shows and watercooler topics: Sense8 -- a Netflix original series about eight individuals from around the globe who share nothing but a psychic-emotional neural pathway connection. When these people connect all boundaries, borders and inhibitions disappear. But gender, identity and relationships have become a growing trend beyond T.V. land. Athletes, politicians and actors are all declaring who they are, and even reshaping who they'd rather be.

Back in the day, before Modern Family's Mitchell and Cam, networks only hinted at homosexual lifestyles (Cagney and Lacey, Kate & Allie). It wasn't until the early '80s that episodics even began to cover the topic of gender and sexual identity, masking through humor (Archie Bunker's Place's "Archie Fixes Fred Up," Three's Company's "The Love Lesson" and Taxi's "Elaine's Strange Triangle"), what was simmering under the surface of humanity (Barney Miller's "The Child Stealers," Trapper John, M.D.'s, "The Straight and Narrow" and Hill Street Blues' "Trial by Fury"). My mother watched many of these shows, quietly and with tremendous pride, from the safety of her sofa. If she were physically here right now, she'd be shocked by some of the scenes blowing up prime-time airwaves lately.

To people like my mom, who generally disapproved of "gratuitous sex or violence" the steaminess of Sense8 could be misinterpreted as a normalized aspect of a media agenda exploiting the age-old marketing maxim: "sex sells." I disagree. If selling sex were still T.V.'s primary mandate, A&E execs wouldn't have cancelled their latest offering, Neighbors with Benefits, after airing only two of seven episodes. My gut says this goes deeper.

Sense8 is not just about with whom we have sex, or how we do it (Ok, even despite the rainbow colored . . . umm, just watch episode 2). This is about the shifting of our consciousness to a new and more expansive paradigm that affects everyone's sense and sensibilities when it comes to relationship. There is a greater human benefit to the airing of shows that openly and exhaustively present not just the IDEA of sexuality and gender identity, but parades the concepts with more color than the San Francisco Gay Pride marches I attended as a teen with my mom and her partner. As visionary Gene Roddenberry epically coined we are going where no man has gone before, only this time we're taking the lesbians, bisexuals, transgenders, questioning and intersex along too!

The explosiveness of this pop culture subject matter is less about being peeping toms into dirty little secrets (think 50 Shades), than ushering in a more global perspective in which all forms of human love, connection and acceptance are to be seen, supported and most importantly, celebrated. Consider the other awesome new Netflix original: Grace and Frankie. Martin Sheen and Sam Waterston, clearly hetero actors, convincingly portray a gay couple, while co-stars Lily Tomlin (a lesbian in real life) and Jane Fonda echo the platonic BFF Kate and Allie vibe. It raises the question . . . is art imitating life, or the other way around?

Who cares?!

The truth needed to be spoken out loud and proud and now it has. So sayeth the Supreme Court! LGBTQI issues have never been so prevalent or accepted in mainstream society. Gays are no longer exotic and exaggerated cartoonish Greenwich Village types. Today, there is hardly a public high school in most major metropolitan areas without a GSA (gay student alliance) and you can't tell which kid is "one of them."

So brava to she-ros Jazz Jennings, the newest TLC reality star and poster child for transgender youth, Caitlyn Jenner, Lana Wachowski, part of the brother and now sister, creative duo of Sense8, and Jamie Clayton, the transgender actress from its ensemble cast. Their fame, 15 minutes of otherwise, is built upon the shoulders of countless mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children who will never shine on any screen. So please remember these people, like my mother of blessed memory, who raise their offspring with quiet dignity, step tentatively and sometimes fearfully into their truth, struggle to find their strength, and teach their children love, tolerance and the power of connection.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Here's Why LGBT Equality Must Be About More Than the U.S.

$
0
0
Like many reading this, I was elated over the Supreme Court's marriage ruling on June 26. Two days later, Jeff (my partner of 20 years) and I joined friends to celebrate New York's annual LGBT Pride March. And with the timing of the court's decision, you could feel the hope among the millions of participants marching down Fifth Avenue.

Our joy was colored, however, by the news coming out of Istanbul where activists had tried to celebrate LGBT Pride several hours before New York's march kicked off. And where attendees were met by riot police armed with water cannons, rubber bullets, and pepper spray. While we were toasting the marriage victory with our mimosas held high here in the U.S., our counterparts in Turkey were running for their very lives.

People who support and work at various points in our movement have been trying to anticipate how our movement should evolve after this historic milestone.

As we go forward, the movement's agenda in the U.S. includes a number of clear priorities, including employment nondiscrimination, still lacking in the 29 states where a person can be fired on the basis of their sexual orientation. The number of states is even higher (32) for transgender people in search of a secure and stable job.

But we also have to be concerned about countering so-called "religious liberty" legislation being passed in states like Indiana, giving a free pass to those who want to undermine laws protecting LGBT people from discrimination.

These issues are familiar to anyone who has been reading the news headlines following the Supreme Court ruling. Unfortunately, support for LGBT activists abroad has not found its place on that agenda. It's almost as if our concern for the lives of LGBT people ends at our nation's shores.

So allow me to go on record by stating: We in the U.S. are not, in fact, the world. We need to cure our movement of its myopia and remember that justice for the LGBT community is a global cause, spreading far beyond our borders.

LGBT activists around the world have repeatedly asked us to support their work to improve such dire circumstances. We need to answer their call.

And yet, I have often heard the argument among LGBT activists here in the States that we already have enough on our plates. We can't afford to divert our attention elsewhere for fear the U.S. movement will lose its own momentum.

I call bull. And I don't think many of those asserting that argument fully understand the magnitude of the fatal consequences of inaction.

In more than 75 countries worldwide, you can be arrested simply on the basis of your sexual orientation. These countries have a collective population of over 3 billion -- nine times the number of people living in the U.S. and almost 43 percent of the world's population. In eight of those countries, it's perfectly legal to be sentenced to death for being gay or lesbian.

I would encourage you to take a moment to reflect on those numbers.

Do you remember the old American Express slogan "Membership has its privileges"? The catchy saying referred to an exclusive set of benefits not available to other credit cardholders. LGBT Americans are similarly entitled to a long list of benefits granted to us through citizenship -- usually obtained by the total accident of birth -- and increasingly recognized by the institutions that govern our lives.

But these privileges come with the moral obligation for us to help others who by no accident of birth and no fault of their own do not share our good fortune. The LGBT movement here in the States is part of a larger and, sadly, more difficult world for LGBT people. We must see justice in global terms and do our part to ensure others abroad are afforded the same kind of freedoms in their own communities that we here increasingly take for granted.

I recently accompanied Arcus' trustees on a trip to Africa where we were invited to meet some of the 300 LGBT activists from across the continent who had gathered at a regional conference in Kenya. We left deeply affected by the passionate leaders we met who are leading LGBT activism on a continent that remains both largely misunderstood and nearly completely unfunded. In a world as connected and integrated as ours, there's simply no excuse for either of those facts.

We cannot and should not turn a blind eye to the grim realities that affect so many LGBT people around the world.

All of us here in the States -- individuals, organizations, and funders -- can leverage our influence and connections so that LGBT activists abroad can benefit from a broader range of support to achieve their goals. The question is: Will we?

Learn more about Arcus' Social Justice program and how it works to ensure that individuals and families around the world of every sexual orientation and gender identity are able to live their lives with dignity and respect, and express their love and sense of self.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.










Donald Trump Butt Plug Now Available For Your Pleasure (NSFW)

$
0
0
Ever want Donald Trump to kiss your ass?

Fernando Sosa, a 31-year-old Florida artist, is telling the real-estate-mogul-turned-presidential-candidate where to stick it. He has created a butt plug that looks likes the Donald. It's got everything from his puckered lips to his trademark comb-over.

"I wanted to do something insulting," Sosa told The Huffington Post. "I like the mental picture of his face going into people's asses."

The sex toy was created in reaction to Trump's last month blasting of Mexico and Mexican immigrants. "They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists," he said in remarks after launching his presidential campaign.

Sosa used a 3D printer to get Trump's trademark hair to whip up just right.

"The technology requires a certain thickness and texture on the hair, so duplicating his thin, see-through comb-over was tough," he said.

They sell for $27.99. Future versions will come with accessories for Trump's noggin like a snap-on toupee and a piece of artificial poop that will also fit snugly on the head.

trump butt plug

Sosa has done similar sex toys for Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Rand Paul, among others, but said he never planned to do Trump.

"I didn't think he was going to run," Sosa said. "And then he made those comments about Mexicans. I was born in Mexico so I stopped working on Jeb Bush to do him."

Although Trump is notorious for trying to control the use of his image, Sosa believes First Amendment rules regarding free speech and political parody will protect him in court.

"It does seem like he likes to file frivolous lawsuits, so he might sue me just to scare me," Sosa said. "Rich people don't have to be right to sue. I'd love for him to take me to court."

The Huffington Post reached out to Donald Trump via Twitter, but has not received a response.

Sosa is now planning to finish up the Jeb Bush butt plug and has other ideas of who to do next.

"People really seem to love anything with Chris Christie, and I'd like to do Lindsey Graham," Sosa said. "The way they spoof him on 'The Daily Show,' I get this image of him in a dress."



Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact The Author

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.










What It Would Be Like If Key And Peele (And 2 Chainz) Formed A Wedding Band

$
0
0


 


The key to a great wedding reception is great music. And the key to great wedding music is Key and Peele. 


In a new YouTube sketch, the comedy duo play members of a fictional Scottsdale, Arizona-based wedding band called Absorption. 


"What we do is take popular songs and we tailor-make them to your wedding so they can only be performed for your wedding," Key says. 


In other words, wedding dance floor mainstays are rewritten for the marrying couple. "A little ditty about Jack and Diane" becomes "A little ditty about Rooja and Padmalaya, two American kids growing up eating tikka masala."


Another tune in Absorption's repertoire is Macklemore's same-sex wedding anthem "Same Love," which they flawlessly revamped and personalized for two of their clients. 


"They can't change even if they try, even if we wanted them to. Chris keeps Chris warm, Chris keeps Chris warm." 


And if couples want to take things up a notch, they can always upgrade to the deluxe package, which features performer Master Collaborator -- a.k.a. 2 Chainz with a saxophone.


Our advice: definitely splurge for the deluxe package.   


H/T Mashable 


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.










Few School Districts Have Anti-Bullying Policies Protecting LGBT Students

$
0
0
A majority of American school districts have no policies protecting LGBT students from bullying, according to a report released Wednesday.

Nearly 30 percent of school districts have no official anti-bullying policy, according to the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, which surveyed more than 13,000 school districts. Of the 70 percent of school districts that do have anti-bullying policies, fewer than half explicitly outline protections for students who get bullied because of their sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation. Only about 14 percent of districts have protections based on gender identity or expression.

America's LGBT community has made historic strides in recent weeks. In late June, the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide, using the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause to support the ruling. In early July, the U.S. Department of Justice sided with a transgender teen suing his school district because it will not let him use the boys restroom.

Still, the report found that many school districts fail to comply with state laws requiring anti-bullying codes, while others go beyond what their states mandate.

The report "illustrates the gap that can emerge between the intentions of a law and the actual implementation –- arguably the most critical component of the passage of any law," said Eliza Byard, Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network executive director, in a press release. "There remain far too many school districts that have failed to institute policy protections, even in states which require them by law. As a result, these schools continue to fail our students.”

The organization analyzed the anti-bullying policies of every school district from 2008 to 2011.

The map below shows which states are most likely to have school districts with any anti-bullying policy. The graph shows which states have school districts with the most inclusive anti-bullying policies.



Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network's annual school climate survey, which asks LGBT youth about their experiences in school, shows that "students who believe that their schools have LGBT-inclusive policies experience better school climates," the report says.

The group's most recent school climate report from the 2012-2013 school year found that of the 8,000 students surveyed, more than 55 percent reported feeling unsafe at school due to their sexual orientation.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.










5 Things Same-Sex Couples Need To Know About Social Security

$
0
0
Until the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling requiring states to recognize same-sex marriages, Social Security was a crapshoot for gay couples. The Social Security Act says that in order for a surviving or former spouse to receive benefits from a worker's record, the state that couple lived in needed to recognized their marriage. So if a same-sex married couple were legally married in one state but lived in a state that didn't recognize their marriage, no spousal benefits could be claimed.

But the recent court ruling changed all that. States are now required to allow same-sex marriage and to recognize those marriages when they occur in other states. And that recognition opens the door to Social Security’s spousal and survivor benefits -- considered to be among the most valuable features of the program.

That's the good news. The bad news is that now same-sex couples can be as confused as heterosexual couples are when it comes to tapping into the SSA. Here are five things everyone should know:

1. For all things Social Security, it pays to be married -- literally.
At your full retirement age, your benefit as a spouse can be equal to one-half of your mate's full retirement amount. Claiming Social Security benefits as a married couple (instead of as two single individuals) can increase additional lifetime benefits significantly -- in some cases, to the tune of $100,000 or more.

2. When your spouse dies, you will be provided for.
There are a ton of rules around claiming survivor benefits, but in a nutshell, if you are married and your spouse dies, you can claim Social Security benefits based on their working record instead of your own. So, if your spouse earned way more than you did, you would be eligible to receive their higher earned benefit for the rest of your life -- which, again, wouldn't be possible if you claimed Social Security as two single individuals. If you and your spouse earn about the same, the impact of this benefit will be minimal. But prior to the Supreme Court ruling, not having your marriage recognized meant no money paid to a survivor.

3. To have loved and lost beats never having loved at all.
Put more directly: Divorce beats never marrying. That's because if you are divorced, you can still collect Social Security benefits from the work record of your ex. Doing this won't impact how much his/her present spouse collects. This only works if you are single though. Once you remarry, this money faucet turns off. To get benefits as an ex-spouse, your marriage must have lasted at least 10 years.

4. Opposite-sex couples may still get more Social Security money than same-sex couples.
Financial Engines recently estimated that the value of spousal and survivor benefits is even larger for heterosexual couples because there are greater age differences among spouses in opposite-sex marriages. These age differences increase the potential values of marriage benefits, especially survivor benefits. Women outlive men and spend more than 11 years on average as widows, according to the Society of Actuaries, so survivor benefits are enormously important to them.

5. Social Security is like a tree trunk with many branches.
Let's start with a principal earner who is eligible for Social Security retirement benefits. A little-known feature of the Social Security system is that in addition to paying retirement benefits for the retired worker, it may provide benefits to the worker's spouse, an ex-spouse if the marriage lasted at least 10 years, and dependent children and grandchildren, depending on the circumstances. Moreover, these benefits can be paid all at the same time.

Anyone have any other pieces of wisdom to share when it comes to Social Security? Please tell us about it in comments.

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.










Shame on Facebook: How Zuckerberg's Confusing "Real Names" Policy Hurts More Than It Helps

$
0
0
2015-07-14-1436832237-9985898-shameonfb.jpg
Signs from protest at SF Pride: "Shame on FB." Photo by Gareth Gooch.



In a recent Townhall Q&A, Mark Zuckerberg finally responded to Facebook's ongoing "real names" controversy. Well, sort of. In a response to a question posed by BuzzFeed reporter Alex Kantrowitz, the social media site's CEO acknowledged "some confusion about what our policy actually is." However, rather than clarifying the company's policy, Zuck merely echoed the same corporate double-speak that we've been hearing from the company for months: that Facebook has no plans to abandon this discriminatory policy, but also claims to be "working" to make it better.

A bit of background: Facebook's so-called "real names" policy came under storm last September when hundreds of drag queens—myself included—had our accounts reported as "fake" and removed from the site. We learned that we weren't the first or the only ones—many marginalized people, including LGBTQ people, Native Americans, survivors of domestic and sexual violence, political dissidents, and other sexual, ethnic, or cultural minorities had been blocked or had their profiles changed to their legal names without their consent. In many cases, being outed exposed people to further discrimination or physical harm. So, being good drag queens, we decided to raise a ruckus, and ended up with an apology from the company's Chief Product Office Chris Cox. Unfortunately, his promise to do better turned out to be empty, as Facebook has resisted significant changes to either its policy or enforcement procedures.

In his recent statement—hot on the heels of recent protests at Facebook's headquarters and San Francisco Pride—Zuckerberg tried to dismiss the issue as user confusion, but his own convoluted response is just another example of how unclear and inconsistent Facebook's policy is as a whole. While Facebook likes to talk about the bandaids it has put forward in response to backlash, there's only one true solution: it's time for Facebook to listen to its users and do away with this policy for good.


Survivor Safety

2015-07-14-1436832790-2081543-yourapologywasalie.jpg
Sign from protest at Facebook HQ: "Your apology was a lie." Photo courtesy of #MyNameIs campaign.


The company's main soundbyte for the past several months is that "real names" keep people safe. Zuckerberg offers the example of a woman leaving an abusive ex-husband, suggesting that because the perpetrator is compelled to use his real name, she "can easily block him." But it's not always that easy, and Facebook's policies and procedure still leave her exposed in a dangerous ways.

Most importantly, Facebook presumes that this hypothetical abuser is playing by the site's rules. Given that he's already committed a crime—and keeping in mind the stakes of domestic and sexual violence—it's probably safest to presume he's not. Even with the current policy, it's incredibly easy to create new profiles under a "normal" sounding name: Facebook's culturally-biased algorithms only flag accounts at sign-up if they're deemed suspicious; otherwise users only have to show ID if they're later reported by another user as "fake." Thus, while queer, trans, and Native American accounts get shut down, it's actually quite easy to create an army of John Smiths or Bob Joneses.

In Zuck's example, the woman who survived abuse would not only have to block her ex's account, but may also need to stay on the lookout for the additional profiles he created to stalk her. (Or for accounts that belong to his buddies, who may allow him to sign in on the sly.) It not only shows that the policy is discriminatory, but also places quite a burden on someone whose safety is already at risk: blocking should be a last resort. Instead, she should have tools to prevent herself from being found in the first place.


Protecting Privacy

2015-07-14-1436832838-6844109-facebookexposedmetomyabuser.jpg
Sign from protest at Facebook HQ: "Facebook exposed me to my abuser." Photo courtesy of #MyNameIs campaign.


Zuckerberg's other short-sighted claim is that "real names" make things "easy because you can just type [someone's] name into search and find them." While it may make it convenient to find your friends, this very same search bar makes it all-too-easy for a perpetrator or stalker to find his victim. (In some cases, she may even pop up in his "People You May Know" feed!) Facebook has made some improvements to its privacy tools after years of criticism, but a user's name, profile photo, and networks always remain public—and searchable.

In 2014, the National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV) worked with Facebook to publish a guide that assists survivors in locking down their accounts, and while it raises concerns about some implications of this policy, it largely steers clear of the details. But NNEDV's own Survivor Privacy resources generally recommend that survivors "maximize their privacy by using being careful about what they share," including "not using your real name in your email or username."

This isn't merely hypothetical. The #MyNameIs campaign has received testimonies from dozens of survivors, including women who have been outed or found on Facebook, and would prefer to use a pseudonym in order to maintain their privacy and safety while still connecting with friends and loved ones. And it's not just survivors. We've heard from political dissidents, government bureaucrats, teachers, healthcare workers, law enforcement officials, sex workers, judges, and many others who all need a bit of added privacy between different realms of their lives. Just two days ago, the campaign received an email from an Ethiopian LGBTQ activist whose account had been reported: if forced to use his legal name, he could face violence or imprisonment, but if he loses his account, thousands of LGBTQ Ethiopians will lose access to a valuable space to share resources and build community. Rather than responding to these concerns with policy or procedural change, Facebook continues to dig in its heels and tell vulnerable users that it knows what's best for us.


Authentic Accounts

2015-07-14-1436833060-3245296-fakenamereportingpunishesidentity.jpg
Sign from protest at Facebook HQ: "Fake name reporting punishes identity not behavior." Photo by Gareth Gooch.


For transgender users—as well as people of color, artists, and others whose identities fall outside of the Facebook's predominantly straight, white, male employee demographics—the "confusion" Zuckerberg speaks of largely centers around the burden of proving that your identity is authentic. Ironically, Facebook claims that this policy is meant to promote accountability, and yet, their enforcement process itself lacks transparency. Instead, Facebook sets the policy, decides if you're "authentic," and denies any process of appeal. Moreover, by allowing users to report each other for "fake names"—while better options exist to report harassment or actual identity fraud—Facebook's policy gives cyberbullies to harass vulnerable users simply for being themselves.

Zuckerberg responded in the Q&A that part of the confusion is that "[your] real name does not mean your legal name." And indeed, one of the changes Facebook likes to brag about making is that users now have options of submitting forms of ID that aren't issued by a government. But the list of alternatives Facebook provides is itself confounding, asking that users submit two documents, one of which must include a photo or date of birth. However, the vast majority of options—including bus passes, library cards, magazine subscriptions, and utility bills—almost never have these types of information. Moreover, most people who have a common nickname are still likely to use their legal name on these forms of ID for reasons of bureaucracy or convenience, and because these documents have little social bearing: very few people greet someone by the name on their bus pass!

Of course, for transgender people—especially youth, people of color, and low-income people—obtaining any of these documents in one's authentic name can be expensive and legally difficult. Even a former Facebook employee who helped expand Facebook's gender options had her account reported and suspended just before this year's Pride celebrations, despite using the same name she had used on her employee badge months before.

That's why the #MyNameIs campaign has suggested that Facebook develop an alternate system—like an expansion of its Trusted Contacts program or photo verification similar to Reddit's "Ask Me Anything" series—that promotes accountability (and screens out spam and bots) without relying on a piece of paper.


Data That Demands Change

2015-07-14-1436833163-6800892-mynameisgarethgooch.jpg
Protestors spell out "#MyNameIs" in front of Facebook HQ "thumbs up" sign. Photo by Gareth Gooch.


Finally, it's worth noting that Facebook has not yet provided any data to back up its arguments, including Zuckerberg's claim that "people are much less likely to try to act abusively towards other members of our community when they're using their real names." And we know that if there's one thing Facebook has, it's data. Instead, sources have suggested that allowing pseudonyms—neither legal names nor anonymous logins—can actually increase both the quantity and quality of engagement online.

For example, a 2012 study by the popular blog commenting platform Disqus (which allows users to create an account tied to their Facebook profile or a pseudonym, or to post comments anonymously), found that "the average commenter using a pseudonym contributed 6.5 times more than anonymous commenters and 4.7 times more than commenters identifying with Facebook." It also showed that pseudonymous commenters were more likely to leave positive comments.

As one of the world's predominant communications platforms with nearly 1.5 billion users, Facebook has a responsibility to ensure that it's not silencing well-intentioned users, especially those whose voices are already silenced too often in society. And as its users, we have a responsibility to demand change.

If Facebook truly wants people to use their real names—and apply this policy equitably and effectively—it would not only demand ID at signup, but would ask all of its existing users to fork over their ID retroactively. Activists certainly don't want that, and Facebook probably doesn't either: it would be a huge logistical nightmare, open the company up to countless legal liabilities, and likely result in its large user base shrinking very fast.

As it is, Facebook's policy disproportionately affects certain categories of users, and whether intentional or not, that's discriminatory as well as dangerous for many. So, Zuck, let's cut through the confusion and make things perfectly clear: it's time for Facebook to be accountable to its community and delete this policy once and for all.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Remembering Gay Icon Elaine Stritch

$
0
0
2015-07-13-1436811601-7772352-Elaine_Stritch_2_Allan_Warren.jpg
Image of Elaine Stritch in her dressing room Savoy Theatre, London, by Alan Warren, courtesy of Wikipedia Commons

Theatre legend Elaine Stritch died one year ago on 17 July. As the anniversary of her death approaches Alex Hopkins shares his personal memories of an icon who lived on her own terms

I first met Elaine Stritch in 2002. She was about to open in her one woman show, Elaine Stritch at Liberty, at The Old Vic. The show had already won plaudits on Broadway and would go on to win Stritch a Tony Award.

Shamefully, I had not heard of the 78 year old star who was about to take London's theatre world by storm, but my friend Velma had. Velma (real name Ian), was known as one of London's finest men's hairdressers. After years of working in The Savoy, he had taken over the salon directly outside the hotel. Numerous celebrities had sat in Velma's chair and he had outrageous stories about all of them ("Arthur Laurents? A poison dwarf, dear"; "Leonard Bernstein? Glorious, but I fear he picked up my cold...he carked it soon after"(, but little did he know that he was about to face his greatest coiffeuring challenge yet.

Velma wasn't Stritch's hairdresser to start with - that honour was left to a corpulent, simpering, American queen in his late 40s, with a comb over like the maginot line - but Velma's salon, Number 10, was used as Stritch's base: each day, before she was driven to the Old Vic, she'd stride out of the Savoy and plump herself down in one of Velma's chairs as her haidresser set to work.

Velma texted me the first day she arrived: "She's here, dear. But be very careful when you walk in. She's NOT in a good mood." I edged my way carefully into the salon. Stritch had her back to me, but her face was visible in the mirror - those clear blue eyes sparkled fiercely as they followed every movement the shaking hairdresser made with the setting lotion. "For fuck's sake, get a grip will yer?" she screamed. Velma shot me an anxious look and we retreated into the backroom as the hairdresser dropped the comb.

I can recall the exact moment Velma introduced me to Elaine. She was about to leave the salon and grabbed for her fur coat. She stared directly into my eyes and shook my hand firmly. "Come to the show," she demanded. "Ian, I'll see you tomorrow." And then she was gone, swept up in back of her car.

Over the next few weeks Velma went on 'Stritch Watch', and I'd receive regular updates via text: "Stritch has just left the Savvy, dear - she's in a GREEN turban" ; "Her hairdresser just presented Stritch with Gladioli. 'I fucking hate gladioli,' she bellowed." After it became clear that her hairdresser couldn't "cut the mustard", he was spectacularly sacked and Velma took over as Stritch's hairdresser - dressing the immaculate grey locks of one of his greatest idols, for the whole of the Old Vic run.

Velma and Elaine got to know one another. They talked. She gave him the theatrical anecdotes that he loved and he soaked them up. But she also let him talk. Sitting alone in his salon he slowly opened up about the hidden pain in his life: his longterm partner, John, was sitting at home killing himself with vodka and parasitical young men. At first Velma was careful what he said. His experience with celebrities had told him that they often only wanted to hear so much and that their ego was all that really mattered. But Elaine had surprised him. She had listened and empathised. She spoke candidly about her own experiences with alcohol, and by placing a hand gently on Ian's shoulder she made him feel a little less frightened.

I will never forget the generosity that Elaine showed both myself and Ian during that month in London. She made sure tickets were available whenever we wanted to see her show and invited us to her first night party. But for a woman who defined the Broadway stage, there was nothing of the cult of celebrity about her. "I don't do that star bullshit," she told us one day. My overriding image of her is at that first night party. She arrived late and entered the huge room alone, without any fanfare. We looked up and suddenly she was there, standing at the top of the stairs, in her trouser suit, Pepsi bottle in hand, eyeing the crowd below carefully - at once a part of this showbiz world, but also entirely separate from it.

Her abruptness could be daunting, but it earnt her unanimous respect. You knew where you were with Stritch. I remember an afternoon in her suite. She answered the door in a dressing gown and pointed to the bathroom. A tub, the size of a small flat, was overflowing with flowers. "What a fucking waste," she snapped. "They'll only die!" She then turned to Ian, pointing at a beautiful bouquet of orchids: "those are from Elton; you have them." I was battling alcohol problems of my own at the time and spoke to Elaine briefly about this. "Get a hold of it or it'll finish you off," she said. Those words were more powerful than many sessions with a trained drink counsellor. But you also knew when you'd over stepped the mark and hit a nerve. "Do you miss booze, Elaine?" I'd naively asked. She'd slammed her fists down on the table as those fiercely intelligent eyes bore into me. "Of course I fucking miss booze. Every fucking day! Now pass the coffee." Her talent was taking the pain and frustration she'd shown in those few seconds - which must have been unbearable at times - and translating it into art.

This art came from her status as an outsider; Stritch answered to no one. She didn't care what others thought - what other woman, pushing 80, would have ripped up a stage every night in nothing but an oversized white shirt and pair of form-fitting black tights? She had no time for self-indulgence and advocated utter integrity. Talent, for her, meant hard work and complete honesty. She was indefatigable in her quest for the truth and embraced both her personal failings and life's cruelties with hilarious self-deprecation. But above all of this, she was wise and sincere. And those were the qualities she lived by - both on and off the stage.

In 2008, six years after her triumphant Old Vic show, Elaine brought a slightly truncated version of Elaine Stritch at Liberty back to London - to The Shaw Theatre. Although she stumbled over a few lines, she remained peerless. Belting out the same songs in that inimitable, gravel-like voice, she hoisted herself up on a stool, dragged it around the stage and fumed and rejoiced at the insanity of humankind. It was a masterclass in joy.

But it was what Elaine revealed when off duty that really touched me. Hearing that Elaine was returning to London, my friend Velma had called and left a message for her at the Carlyle Hotel, her New York residence. Velma was in France when Elaine called back - his nephew was house sitting and picked up the phone.

"This old woman called for you. She was extremely abrupt. 'Tell him Elaine called,' was all she said. Then she hung up."

Velma called Elaine back when she arrived in London.

"Yeah, Ian, what do you want?" she asked, as direct as ever. Velma stumbled - it had been years since they'd seen each other and he'd forgotten just how no-nonsense she was. But then they'd talked, just as they had those eight years ago. And, again, Elaine listened. She fell silent as Ian explained that the drink had finally got John - leaving him dead, in a pool of blood, on the bed they had once shared. Ian wept and then pulled himself together - and still Elaine listened and in her silence Ian knew that she understood; that was all that he needed to know.

"You take care of yourself, Ian. We need you," she'd said quietly before she hung up.

The best people in our lives, no matter how long we know them, have the gift of making us feel valued and a little less alone. Elaine Stritch had that gift in spades.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Jesus Is Gay

$
0
0
Jesus is gay. I use the present tense because as a gay Christian, he is with me now and throughout the eternal life of my soul.

How did I come to take gay Jesus as my savior? As the world has grown more embracing of the GLBT community so have many people of faith...but not all.

I was drawn back to my church, as are many, at a vulnerable and lonely time. I found a wonderful parish where not only were GLBT people welcome, we had our own ministry. Our pastor never re-visited homophobic dogma as we served Christ via bake sales, potlucks and retreats. The velvet-gloved bitch slap came as a pamphlet, sent on behalf of our scowling former pope in his Prada slippers and hat Donatella Versace might wear to Fashion Week Luncheon. Homosexuals are welcome but "disordered," and we must repudiate what our bathing suits cover. As you can imagine, after that, our numbers dwindled at least for a time.

Had the pope been right? Were Adam and Steve as much a crime against nature as Liza Minelli and David Gest?

Jesus is gay. I know because I am gay and he loves me. This deceptively simple concept at last silenced the ecclesiastical white noise and ended the debate in my soul. How could I not have seen it? His metrosexual beauty, artistic temperament, (carpentry can be art), gentle nature, excellent listening skills (ever meet a straight man as hot as him who could claim that one?), and it became self-evident. In his taut arms and manicured hands, I found my response to anyone who says unless I reject my innate nature, I can't be saved. Jesus is gay!

Gay Christian youth, some already struggling, are regularly drawn into churches with Up with God messages and Jesus rocks music. Only later to discover, after letting down their guard, that the other intolerant shoe drops. "Well, yes Jesus loves you," they say. "But he hates your sins." When the now even more vulnerable kid pleads an infallible God made them this way, it's back to the old "Knock it off or there's the door" routine. The results are often as tragic as they are avoidable. Rachel Maddow, some righteously indignant pencil waving please.

Unto these traumatized outcasts and refugees of homophobes in the lamb's clothing, I say dry your eyes and take gay Christ into your heart. The day of reckoning has arrived! And I don't mean the Barney's warehouse sale. When our Father Abraham, Justice Anthony Kennedy, delivered us to the promised land of marital equality, he did more than codify our right to stroll zombie-like through Home Depot in search of the perfect door knocker; or endure our child's teacher doing her best Church Lady impression and saying "Isn't that special," through a thin-lipped smile of acknowledgement little Mason has to Mommies. At least Modern Family has eased that crossing, along with Rosie's cruises, and that Neil Patrick Harris because he's such a stitch. And he sings too!

Now Catholicism has a doctrinal Gordian knot to untie before the disordered nonsense can be banished into the trashcan of prejudice, but evangelical churches, which can apple pick from the tree of knowledge, bible verses as articles of faith, have a choice to make, and it is in their response that the lavender light of a righteous Messiah will at last shine upon them.

Two thirds of millennial evangelicals support GLBT marital rights. If their leaders refuse gay and lesbian married couples, aren't they showing their intolerant hand to the pro-gay majority of the youth they crave? For each rejected GLBT couple, how many other non-GLBT congregants will bail too? If the marketing of these churches is Jesus rocks the love, it must be getting harder to later instill any Debbie, the homophobic downer, sermonizing especially when it comes to two people living as Jesus commands: monogamous and faithful to both their marriage and their Christ. Evangelical churches have begun to feel literally damned if we do embrace GBLT marriage, out of business if we don't, and this idea is getting a lot of serious chat, print, and prayer in many communities of faith.

My solution: accept the fabulous news that Jesus is gay. We, righteous GLBT Christians, won't hold theological grudges. We will welcome everyone, without precondition, no matter their lack of knowledge of grooming products or Sondheim. We'll never profess our love and acceptance, only to qualify it later, and let the other Gucci loafer or Doc Marten drop. We will update their music so not all Christian rock sounds like bad eighties cover bands, and return Jesus to just a two syllable name. Most importantly, my GLBT brothers and sisters will demonstrate to these -poly-cotton blend wearing- wretches, that we love Christ as much as anyone else. If not more so, because we have to risk rejection, even when we least expect it, every time we sit in a pew, and still we keep coming back. Ellen, let's dance to our song of praise. A-ay-men, A-ay-men, A-ay-men, Amen Amen!

While the unrepentant remain lost in their wilderness of ignorance, and blaspheme by hating in his name, Sunday mornings, before brunch, we will make welcome our non GLBT Christian brothers and sisters, and teach them our triumphant, harmonized hymns of joy to our gay Christ.

And then we will sing theirs too.

Our Jesus is gay. Theirs is not. Really he's the same man, woman, or transgender (that might make the most sense) but always the same God. We all must clasp hands and venerate the cross he carried (Protestant) or carries (Catholic) for all our salvation. Millions died in unholy wars over that inconsistency until both sides let their love of Christ usurp their differences. Christ now calls us to do the same. "I'm here, I'm queer, trans, bi, straight, or all of the above," he cries. "And I'm going to save your souls!"

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An Interview with Club King Mario Diaz

$
0
0
2015-07-15-1436971376-5313681-Mario1.jpg

www.MarioDiazPresents.com


In the ephemeral world of queer nightlife, it's rare to find a constant and important figure. Mario Diaz, who first made a name for himself back in 90s New York City with his take on what nightlife could be, is just such a person. Raised by "a pack of drag queens," Mario had a specific idea about the kind of atmosphere he wanted to create - one of uninhibited self-expression, sexuality, and fun. Now residing in Los Angeles, Mario is continuing his reign as the king of nightlife with events like Full Frontal Disco and Brutus. I had the chance to catch up with the Club King and chat about how he got his start, the nature of his ethos, and how he feels about the evolving state of queer culture.

You got your start as a nightlife maven in 90s New York, right when Mayor Giuliani was running his whole "quality of life" campaign aimed at "cleaning up" the city. How did that campaign impact the club scene as you knew it?
I actually first started producing events when I was still a wee homo in my Seattle high school days. It was really just about creating something more interesting than what was available. Something with a little more style and a place where my weirdo crew could show off. But NYC was always in my sights so as soon as I graduated I made my way into the big city. And yes, Giuliani was there waiting to put a damper on all my fun. His "quality of life" campaign was starting to take effect. Not my quality and not my life that's for sure. The down and dirty nightlife that I read about and the sexual freedom that was being celebrated was slipping away and I felt cheated. I've always felt, as a gay person especially, that being able to accept our true sexual nature without the shame so many of us cary with it to be essential. So I made it sort of my mission to bring back the sexy, wild NYC I moved there to be a part of.

I've seen Party Monster, and have done my fair share of research on the Club Kids' scene, which was happening around the same time you were getting stared in New York. What was the biggest difference between what you were doing at The Cock and what was going on at places like Limelight?
My first residence in NYC was living with Superstar DJ Keoki, the Disco 2000 DJ and former boyfriend of Michael Alig. The first faces I saw upon my arrival were James St. James and Freeze...Alig and all those kids. I fell in love with James and thought he was hilarious but the rest of the crew left much to be desired. Needless to say I didn't last long in that scene. I always thought Michael was a total dickwad and was flabbergasted that all these children were so far up his ass. But then I saw the way he shoved K in all their noses with abandon and it all made sense. I realize now that my move to the east village may have been fueled a bit by my need to escape that environment. They were wrapped up in drugs and narcissism and we were all about sex and rock and roll. I found my people.

I've heard many people lament the proliferation of smartphones, particularly their impact on what used to be a more private scene. On the other hand, we now have all these amazing photos of what's going on, instead of the almost complete void of photos or video that exist from the earlier days of gay nightlife. Where do you stand on the whole "taking pictures with your smartphone at the club" thing?
Well that's life right? Change? It's either going to be forced upon you or it's in your best interest to create it for yourself. I love the advancements of our technologies in so many ways. The quick fix of information and connection is amazing and I fully partake in the conversation. But I also have a melancholia for the days of past where we were all present with each other and there certainly was a safety net. There was no fear of anyone taking a picture of you wasted with your balls out at the club. That made for a perfect environment for the kind of events I was doing. I was celebrating and facilitating some real amateur exhibitionism with my parties like Foxy and that just wouldn't fly these days. People would be too scared of public embarrassment. Back then we were all being drunk and stupid together, so no one cared or would remember the next day for that matter. I'm just glad I grew up in a time where I was able to experience both realities. Plus I'm a different person and don't need to live that lifestyle anymore. The cities have changed...as have I. It all worked out just fine for me. But these kids today have no idea what real fun looked like. I kinda lucked out.

Along with the use of phones to take pictures, there's also all the hookup apps that have become kind of ubiquitous with the younger generation of gays. How do you think those have impacted the nightlife scene?
It is kinda gross to see guys on there phones all the time. Especially at the bar when there are a gaggle of horny and adorable guys right in front of them. Everyone seems to be out there looking for something better when some real lovely connections could be staring right at them. We are distracted and uneasy. It's kind of scary.

2015-07-15-1436971437-4331051-Mario2.jpg

www.MarioDiazPresents.com


From the beginning of your career, you've made a point of including what many consider to be the more "extreme" elements of gay culture, including lots of drag. Why do you think drag plays an important role in queer culture, and what was your introduction to the world of drag queens?
Well I was raised by a pack of drag queens so I'm biased. I don't know. I've always been a sucker for a queen. They are generally smarter, funnier, more talented and bad ass than most. I just like being around people who are fearless and make me laugh. And remember these are the bitches who led the front lines at Stonewall. We owe them our gratitude. They're the reason these gay kids today are 'out' in friggin' middle school. It wasn't long ago that there were no gay kids out in school at all. I was the only out little new wave homo in my entire school experience. I think we were tougher and had thicker skin then. Being oppressed and bullied was a much darker reality back in the day. Imagine being so afraid of your lisp and spending your whole life in the closet. The younger feys today need to acknowledge and respect where they came from. Don't be scared to stand out and get your sass on. Because every time you strut your shit there's some kid out there looking at you. And he sees that he's not a total freak, He's just fierce.

I've been at Full Frontal Disco (at Akbar) and watched you instruct your models to stand perfectly still. I believe your exact words were, "You are mannequins! No moving around!" That kind of attention to detail is synonymous with your events. What motivates you to create such a perfectly designed space for people to party in?
Because I'm an anal retentive control freak? I'm just trying to keep things aesthetically interesting and fresh. As the years go by it all seems to have been done. And once you find a fresh interpretation people are on your coattails pilfering all the ideas. I'm just glad I can still have ideas and don't have to make a career stealing everyone else's.

When I think about the current state of the gay community, it's a bit hard to even call it a "gay community," with the word police on patrol. For such a relatively small group of people, why do you think there are so many exclusive groups instead of a big, diverse, gay (as in happy) family?
Everyone is out there trying to feel good about themselves. Finding empowerment in being sexy, funny, charming, stylish, smart or whatever you use for validation. We flock to the group that most facilitates those needs. We all walk into a room wondering what everyone is thinking about us...wondering if we're good enough. When the truth is no one really cares. They're too busy wondering what we think about them. I say just accept who you are and fucking own it.

The recent Supreme Court ruling about marriage equality was a huge deal for a lot of reasons. Did you ever see same-sex marriage becoming a federal right?
I never did. It was so far off the menu growing up in the 80s and for me personally I didn't mind. I've always identified myself as being on the fringe and societal acceptance would only mess that up. I'm so thrilled for all the trans awareness and gay acceptance we live with now. Particularly for all the sensitive kids growing up gay in this world. But I never wanted to be part of the "status quo." Being a shunned outcast and a misfit was where I felt most comfortable. I always knew that me and my people made more sense, were having more fun, looked way cooler and listened to much better music than everyone else and that kicked ass! Now being gay is kind of boring. The taste level has dissipated a bit I think. Don't be mad at me.

2015-07-15-1436971494-8414566-Mario3.jpg

www.MarioDiazPresents.com


With the ruling, combined with the expanding role of queer culture in media (with shows like RuPaul's Drag Race, Modern Family, and Transparent for instance) it seems like people are starting to realize that for the most part, queer people are just like everyone else. Of course that's a great thing in a lot of ways, but do you think queer culture will ultimately suffer from being absorbed into the mainstream?
For me...yes. But I never wanted to be normal.

You're a genius at club promotion, with hugely successful events under your belt both in New York City and Los Angeles. Through the years there have been a few attempts, somehow queer women haven't wound up with a successful, permanent club (even lesbian bars up in SF like The Lexington are disappearing). Why do you think that is?
I don't have that answer but I did work on a lesbian club in NYC at the height of the Drag King movement. It was called CLUB CASANOVA and was produced and hosted by the city's premier King at the time MO B DICK aka Mo Fischer. All the Drag Kings seemed to get there start there. Even that scene has diminished. Not sure why but the dykes at that time didn't drink a lot, would leave early and honestly never really supported each other that well. I'm just telling you what I saw. I have some rad lesbians in my life but I don't know much about that scene. I prefer a mixed scene anyways.

There are a lot of clubs and a lot of promoters, but I can't think of any that have their own documentary! How is everything going with Club King?
It was such a weird thing to be asked to be the subject a documentary. I was hesitant and didn't really feel worthy in a way. But now I'm so grateful and proud of it. It touches me that my story has been an inspiration and has entertained so many people. And getting to travel the world and share it has been a blast. We've done 17 film festivals so far and the next stop is Little Rock Arkansas at the end of the month. I never thought I would find my way there and I'm psyched to get my little rock on!

2015-07-15-1436971543-7185139-ClubKIng.jpg
www.MarioDiazPresents.com


What do you see as the future for gay nightlife, and what role do you see yourself playing?
Nightlife can get a bad rap. But at the end of the day it's a place to connect, have fun and let loose. Life is short and we should all make a point of having a laugh with friends as much as possible. I don't know what the future holds in the "scene" but I'm excited to see where it takes us. All I know is being gay has been the best thing to happen to me. It's just way more fun and the boys are way cuter! Let's keep it up you guys.

www.MarioDiazPresents.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/@MarioDiaz
Instagram: @MarioDiazLovesYou
#MarioDiazPresents

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

YouTube Star Joey Graceffa Talks Coming Out, New Book In GLAAD Interview

$
0
0


YouTube star Joey Graceffa opened up about his decision to come out publicly as gay, telling GLAAD in a new interview that he wanted fans who may be struggling with their own sexuality "to not feel so alone." 


"Originally I needed something to encompass [my new book, In Real Life: My Journey Through a Pixelated World] in a video format," Graceffa told GLAAD's Claire Pires of "Don't Wait," the fairy tale-themed music video released in May, in which the 24-year-old addressed his sexuality for the first time. "So I thought it would be really cool to incorporate three main things in the music video: bullying, dealing with [my mother’s] alcoholism, coming to terms with your sexuality and accepting yourself."


It turned out to be a winning approach. One month after it was posted, the "Don't Wait" video has drawn over 8 million views. 


Coming out, Graceffa added, put "an army" of speculation to rest, but it was far from the most difficult subject he delved into for the book.


"Talking about my history with my mom and her alcoholism was definitely really tough," he said, "but also talking about my first dating experiences and getting my heart broken and re-living those moments...I guess I just have this thing of just pushing things aside in the back of my mind. Writing this, I had to go back through it all." 


In Real Life: My Journey Through a Pixelated World hit shelves on May 19. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

4 Hints That Your Boyfriend Might Be Gay

$
0
0
2015-07-14-1436897522-7655732-ScreenShot20150714at11.10.42AM.png

As a gay man, in Los Angeles, I am surrounded by beautiful women that I'm not attracted to. While I cannot offer them a night of romance, I can help answer the question that I frequently get asked, "Does the guy I'm dating seem gay to you?" Here are 4 helpful hints.

1. Watches Once Upon a Time on ABC.
Alright, I hate to stand by those stereotypes but THIS one is a dead giveaway that your future husband is a lonely gay man. It takes a special kind of gay man to appreciate a show with a super villain team that includes Maleficint, Cruella Deville and Ursula (or as I like to call them "Busted Wilson Phillips").

2. Has Sex with Men
Ladies, LADIES! When your man is having sex with other men, it is a red flag that they could be gay. Its time to break out your confrontation pants and ask him, "When you're having sex with men, are you thinking about me?" If the answer is "no," it is time to move on.

3. Buys Home in Palm Springs with Gay Lover
Okay, hear me out. I get it, it is common in our society for women to think, "My man works hard, he deserves to have anal sex on the fly in his new mid-century modern, five room residence Palm Springs home with his El Salvadorian male lover," but be warned, this could be a gateway into a gay life. Girl, don't get left behind!

4. Wears Skin of Dead Ladies While Flirting With Men
If he's wearing the dead skin of another woman it is time to GET OUT! Honey. HONEY! Don't be afraid to read between the lines. Traditionally when men are wearing the skin of dead ladies they are exploring a more feminine side, and thats A-ok! But when they're flirting with men IN the dead ladies' skin they're crossing a very thin line.

Now for some more helpful hints check out Sofia Gonzalez tackle these challenges and more in her new web series, "We Need to Talk."

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

From Homelessness to Cirque du Soleil

$
0
0
2015-07-15-1436976491-8715591-unnamed5copy.jpg
I had been struggling with heroin addiction for nine years and tried everything to get clean. I was barely keeping a job and frequently going to twelve-step meetings, but I could not stop using heroin because every time I did, I would end up with terrible physical withdrawal. Occasionally I would make it through the withdrawal period, forgetting how horrible it was only to use heroin again, believing this time I could handle it and do it right without becoming addicted. This mindset is common among opiate addicts, and it kept me locked in a repetitive nine-year cycle of addiction. I didn't want to die from addiction and needed to make a drastic decision. Drugs and alcohol had destroyed everything in my life; I ended up homeless and moved from rehabs to mental institutions, and I quit a very promising future in the sport of gymnastics at the age of eighteen. My biggest regret in life had been giving back my gift of acrobatics so I could use more drugs --gymnastics was getting in the way of getting high. In my mind, I believed I was a failure, and this belief kept me running back to the euphoric effects of drugs and alcohol to forget the dreams I had abandoned.

When I was twenty-seven years old, I worked as a clerk for The New York Times, and the company sent me to a rehab. While at the facility, a counselor said if I got clean I could potentially go back to the sport of gymnastics, as she knew how much I loved it and thought it would reignite a passion for life that burned out from addiction. She believed if I found something in life to love again, I would stay clean for it. But how could I get back in shape after shooting heroin for nine years? After that session in rehab, I went up to my room and started doing handstands and pushups. I was ridiculously out of shape but slightly inspired. I returned to work at the paper after rehab but relapsed ninety days later. I was mortified and embarrassed because my job had given me a chance to get my life together. I kept training to get back in shape because I wanted to go back to a normal, fulfilling life, but I kept sliding back with frequent relapses. I was desperate to change and heard from other addicts that there was something called a naltrexone implant that would prevent me from having these relapses.

At this time, the implant procedure was not FDA approved, but I found a doctor in New Jersey who would perform the procedure. The doctor told me I had to be fourteen days free of opiates because the interaction between the medication and opiates would cause instant withdrawal. So I worked hard to get fourteen days clean and was ready for the implant. The doctor made a small incision on my left tricep and inserted a capsule containing the long acting opiate antagonist naltrexone, which slowly released the medication. With this implant I would be safe from heroin for three months, and I went back to get another one before it wore off because I still didn't trust myself.

Subsequently, the naltrexone procedure became unnecessary because a monthly injection that goes by the brand name of Vivitrol became available, which does the same thing in blocking the euphoria and high from heroin. The medication works because, like most addicts, I tried to get high and absolutely nothing happened. This was a bittersweet moment.

I can't even begin to describe what it is like for an addict to be physically blocked from the drugs he or she is addicted to. For five months, I felt a freedom that I hadn't felt since I was a child--knowing that even if I tried to use it wouldn't work. For someone who had been destroyed by addiction for countless years, this was an absolute miracle and changed my life. During those five months of not being able to use, I was able to get back in shape and start training as a contortionist. I was flexible--thanks to my acrobatic background--but contortion was extreme stretching. In the same way body builders tear muscle fibers to get bigger muscles, I tore muscle fibers by stretching them to make them longer. Instead of my usual lunch break of heroin, I stacked boxes of copier paper in the copy room at The New York Times and stretched like a madman on my lunch break, determined to become something else than the self-made junkie I had become. I worked out like an addict and tried to turn all my negative behaviors into positive ones; instead of obsessing about heroin, I obsessed about training; instead of destroying my body with heroin, I destroyed it with exercise.

Five months later my hard work paid off, and I booked my first Broadway show with the legendary Twyla Tharp called The Times They Are A-Changin' with music by Bob Dylan. It was strange to actually meet Bob Dylan as a newly sober man because I had listened to his music extensively high and out of my mind. Addiction is said to be a three-fold disease: physical, mental, and spiritual. The naltrexone took care of the physical aspect, which allowed me the safety to begin to work on the other parts, changing the entire course of my life.

I continued on my path of recovery and worked harder than I ever had before, which allowed me to perform as an acrobat in a production of La Damnation de Faust at The Metropolitan Opera House, directed by Robert Lepage. Mr. Lepage inspired me with his genius direction and kindness, and, in turn, my story inspired him while he wrote a Cirque du Soleil show called Totem. He asked me if I would like to be one of the main characters in Totem, a character called Crystal Man who embodied spiritual and evolutionary change. My character in the Cirque du Soleil show represented my new life.

I toured with Cirque du Soleil for three years; while touring with the show, I wrote my memoir called Acrobaddict, which chronicled my acrobatic and addicted experience in an attempt to help those who are suffering from addiction. Publisher Weekly stated, "A more powerful anti-drug missive would be tough to find," and I am honored and blessed to be able to reach others who are battling with their own demons.

I had eight years of sobriety on March 25, 2015, and continue to credit this to the aid of the medication along with a spiritual foundation. I am not an advocate or representative for the pharmaceutical company and wanted to share my own experience as it could help others who are in a similar problem of endless relapses.

Life wasn't all roses, consisting of several ups and downs, but I did remain sober through it. During these tough and triggering times, I had to do the work and learn how to cope with powerful emotions without using my old, negative coping behaviors. In hindsight, naltrexone gave me an opportunity to show up for myself in ways that weren't possible while using. It essentially helped me get over the difficult physiological hurdle associated with opiate addiction and allowed me to deal with my substance abuse. I'm never too far away from the person I used to be, and I don't take my recovery for granted. I know I could lose it at any time, so I try to help others seek their own path to getting clean because, for some strange reason, this kind of service seems to quiet the demons that used to circle my head.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Golden Girls Retirement Plan: Oh Rose, Where Did Our (Pension) Funds Go?

$
0
0
The Golden Girls Retirement Plan: Oh Rose, Where Did Our (Pension) Funds Go?

2015-07-12-1436731363-3786203-Goldengirlsbettywhite1.jpg

Second in a series. Major intellectuals, foremost philosophers and all my friends at the Abbey agree that most financial (or indeed life) issues can be explained in terms of the "The Golden Girls." In this episode Rose Nylund, played by the inimitable Betty White, faces a double whammy.

I've previously written about the "The Golden Girls Retirement Plan" using one of the best sitcoms ever to make talking about retirement a little more relatable and enjoyable. Response to that post was quite enthusiastic which for me is hugely gratifying. Turns out that Blanche, Rose, Dorothy and Sophia have plenty more to teach us in the financial sector that we'll be looking at in future posts. This one ('Rose Fights Back', Season 5, Episode 4) tackles the critical question: What happens when the pension fund that you've been counting on -- and living on -- goes belly up?


Setting the scene

One can assume from the show that Rose has little in the way of retirement accounts or other savings. She's most likely getting by on her deceased husband Charlie's pension (as a horse shoe salesman, no less) and a pretty modest survivor benefit from Social Security. So when the company that Charlie worked for goes bankrupt and cuts off her pension, she must face the fact that she's going to have get a new job, one that pays enough to keep her solvent. However, she quickly finds herself dealing with something she never expected, age discrimination.

While very few of us have a pension to begin with, this classic episode brings up a few critical issues we all must address today: We are getting older and the burden for funding our retirements now falls fully on our own shoulders. Furthermore, many of us in our advanced years may not even be able to work, either because we can't find a job or we're infirm.

This brings us to the important takeaways from this episode:

• You Can No Longer Count on a Pension to Fully Fund Your Retirement: While it would have been unthinkable to Charlie or Rose that a thriving horse shoe company could possibly ever go bankrupt or default on its pension, these things do happen. Today in the real world at the simplest, the number of workers covered by Defined Benefit Plans (pensions) has been in decline for at least the last 30 years. For most of us, the days when we could count on retiring comfortably on a company pension alone are over. And if we even have a pension, it's not necessarily safe; we should be prepared in case those benefits get cut in the future. In some cases, even if a pension doesn't get fully erased it could be frozen and no longer able to accumulate benefits.

• Social Security Is Not Enough to Retire On Alone: Rose never specifically comes out and says it, but she certainly wouldn't be able to comfortably live on her Social Security checks. Even with three housemates, and a modest cost of living, she finds herself forced into the workforce for her foreseeable future. After spending most of her life as a stay at home mom with few marketable skills, this prospect is clearly terrifying.

• You May Not be Able to Work as Long as You Want to: While applying for jobs, Rose is often called "too old." In a handy sitcom save, she was lucky enough to land a job with consumer reporter Enrique Mas despite her age. But many people nearing retirement find themselves under-employed or have trouble finding work at all. In fact, according to a recent Employee Benefit Research Institute Survey, 49 percent of workers retire earlier than expected. Among the reasons cited, were health, layoffs or caring for a loved one. While you may need to work until full retirement age (which equals 66 to 67 for most of us), you may not always have the choice.

• Proactive Retirement Planning Pays off: Losing a major source of your retirement income would be devastating for most retirees and Rose is no exception. She thought she was set with a pension that would take care of her for the rest of her life. If I were her financial advisor when she and Charlie were socking away funds during their younger years, I would have suggested that she would greatly benefit from some further diversity in her retirement assets. Perhaps an IRA or even just a healthy emergency fund could have alleviated a ton of stress from her situation.

• You Gotta Have Friends: Rose has two major saving graces in this difficult time; her friends, and her good health.

Dorothy, Blanche and Sophia would never let Rose end up on the street like the bag lady she fears she is doomed to become. And their social support is of immeasurable value (full disclosure: I'd certainly take a night of cheesecake with those ladies at home over a blue plate special in a restaurant any day.) Financially, living with the other Golden Girls is most likely a godsend for Rose as well because she gets to live well but at a fraction of the normal cost. But the other Golden Girls aren't rich either and shouldering the extra expenses would cramp their styles.

Luckily, Rose is young enough, motivated enough and healthy enough to go to work, despite her inexperience. Her new job may cause her some neck pain and stress, but it's nothing she can't handle. But if the timing were different and the pension had gone broke ten years down the road, Rose's options for financial security would have been catastrophically limited.

2015-07-12-1436730672-9123257-BettyWhite.JPG

In real life, the beloved Betty White continues to be in demand at a vital and vigorous 93. I'm going to assume she is in better shape financially than Rose Nylund ever was on the show, and that she continues to delight audiences young and old because she wants to, rather than because she needs the paycheck.

Pension or no pension, there are no guarantees in this life. Your life is your responsibility and the time to get started preparing for your later life is now. Cheesecake, anyone?

DAVID RAE, CFP®, is a Los Angeles-based retirement planning specialist with Trilogy Financial Services, a regular contributor to Advocate.com and a financial advisor proudly helping people across the county. Follow him on Twitter @davidraecfp Facebook or via his website, www.davidraefp.com.

2015-07-12-1436731425-3903482-suit1.jpg

Securities and advisory services offered through National Planning Corporation (NPC), Member FINRA, SIPC, a Registered Investment Advisor. Trilogy and NPC are separate and unrelated entities.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Kardashian-Jenner Sisters Support Caitlyn Jenner At The ESPY Awards

$
0
0


Kendall and Kylie Jenner sparkled on the red carpet at the 2015 ESPY Awards on Wednesday night, but the evening was not about them. 


The Jenner sisters attended the award show to support and celebrate their parent Caitlyn Jenner, who is set to receive the Arthur Ashe Courage Award, which is given to those "possessing strength in the face of adversity, courage in the face of peril and the willingness to stand up for their beliefs no matter what the cost."


The 65-year-old former Olympian opted not to walk the red carpet, as a rep for the star explained to Gossip Cop, "It’s not about the press coverage. It’s an award for courage.”


Also in attendance and showing their support for Jenner, were stepdaughters Kim, Kourtney and Khloe Kardashian, who made the very uncharacteristic decision not to walk the red carpet, either. However, Kim's hairstylist, Chris McMillan shared a sneak peek photo of the reality star's look for the evening on Instagram. 




A photo posted by King Kylie (@kyliejenner) on




Jenner's sons Burt, Brandon, Brody and daughter Casey from her previous marriages also showed up in celebration of Jenner's award: 




A photo posted by King Kylie (@kyliejenner) on



It was truly a family affair, as Jenner's 88-year-old mother Esther sat next to the star before she accepted her award.







The former athlete first came out as transgender in an interview with Diane Sawyer in April and formally introduced herself as Caitlyn to the world this past June with with a 22-page Vanity Fair cover story. Since that glamorous and inspiration introduction, Jenner has started her foray into advocacy work in the transgender community


 


Also on Huffpost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Jenny's Wedding

$
0
0
Once the last piece of confetti from Pride has been swept away, the next thing on my Lesbianland agenda is Outfest Los Angeles LGBT Film Festival. This is the annual film festival, sponsored by HBO, featuring the top films made by, for and about queer people. It is essentially the Cannes of queer film.

While others will be speaking of the cinematic merits of these films, I would really like to just tell you how they made me feel.

My first film was Jenny's Wedding. Mary Agnes Donohue, screenwriter of Beaches and White Oleander, offered us another great female lead in Jenny, played by Katherine Heigl. Then there are some great female supporting characters in Jenny's mother, Rose, played by Linda Emond and sister, Anne, played by Grace Gummer. Donohue wrote and directed this film about Jenny and her longtime girlfriend Kitty, played by Alexis Bledel, and their journey to the alter. Jenny is living her life and loving her girl when she realizes that she wants to take the next step, getting married and starting a family. The challenge is, Jenny's not out to her family.

So begins one of the most honest portrayals of the coming out experience I have seen on screen, at least for this woman. I remember being just like Jenny, racked with anxiety when she decides to finally come out to her parents. The coming out scenes with her parents were hard to watch. The lines, while not verbatim, were so much like ones that I heard during my own coming out process. The reactions felt so honest and on point, I definitely found myself crying in recognition of hearing the disappointment and confusion; of watching Jenny become increasingly defiant when she finally allowed herself to stop pretending.

This film was really about awakening. Each character had their own awakening. Each was set on a new path because Jenny wanted to finally be honest about her life and her love. This story of what happens when we let go of the illusions and live our lives out loud is uplifting at best and devastatingly familiar at worst.

They chose to premiere the film at Outfest. I thought it was pretty cool and a bit brave to premiere it here. This was a straight writer/director and cast. This is, as I said, the Cannes of queer films. They clearly had nothing to worry about. Yet, they were buoyant with the reception they received from the Outfest audience. Katherine Heigl used the word grace. It was just as important to them to be honest about the story as it is to us living that story. This is what an ally is.

Donohue said she was inspired to write it when she saw a family member go through the wedding process and the struggles that her family was challenged with. It was funny because the audience seemed kind of floored that something so honestly queer could be written, directed and acted all by straight people. I imagine it feels gratifying to know that you got it right.

Each of the main characters had their own subplot, as much as I loved Rose, the mother. I was really blown away by Anne, Jenny's sister. Her awakening was the most gratifying to watch. It was an awakening I have seen in others and it too was really honest and completely scarily accurate. It is the reason why living our truth can have ripple effects way beyond our understanding. It was because Anne witnessed what happened for Jenny, she was able to find the courage to heal and live her own truth.

This film will be released July 31 and I am encouraging you to go see it. Take your lover, partner, friend, parent, sister, brother, wife. I laughed and cried and cheered (silently). I thought of PFLAG groups all over the country taking their members on a field trip. I thought of taking my mother and sister when they come visit me this summer.

I was so grateful for this movie. I found myself smiling all over again while I wrote this. It felt good. Plus, it was a story of a woman finally ready to get married to the girl of her dreams. Which essentially means it's the ultimate lesbian chick flick. It was the story of living your truth thereby helping others to do the same. Again, chicks love movies about women living their truth. It's a great summer movie for Girls Night Out or date night.

Jenny's Wedding opens July 31.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Judge Rules Utah Must Recognize Same Sex Parents On Child's Birth Certificate

$
0
0

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the state of Utah to list the names of a lesbian couple on a birth certificate as the mothers of their new baby in a ruling that lawyers said was the first of its kind since the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage.


U.S. District Judge Dee Benson said the assisted reproduction case wasn't hard to decide.


"The state has failed to demonstrate any legitimate reason, actually any reason at all, for not treating a female spouse in a same-sex marriage the same as a male spouse in an opposite-sex marriage," Benson said in his ruling from the bench.


Lawyer Joshua Block with the American Civil Liberties Union said it was the first ruling in an assisted reproduction case since the June decision from the high court, though several similar cases have been filed around the country.


Angie and Kami Roe of West Jordan said in their lawsuit on the issue that the state should treat wedded lesbian couples the same as heterosexual couples who use sperm donors to have children.


State law automatically recognizes a husband who agrees to assisted reproduction as a father, but the Utah attorney general's office contended that doesn't extend to same-sex couples because child bearing is legally different from marriage.


"It is a fact that a non-biologically related female spouse can never be the biological father of a child," state attorneys wrote in court documents. "It is a biological impossibility for a woman who does not give birth to a child to establish paternity of a child through the act of birth."


Parker Douglas with the Utah attorney general's office said Wednesday that listing non-biological parents on a birth certificate could throw off state record-keeping and disrupt the ability of authorities to identify public health trends.


The judge, however, pointed out that the same problem could apply when married heterosexual couples use sperm donors.


Douglas declined to comment on whether the state would appeal the ruling.



The Roes sued after hospital staff members refused to take their birth certificate paperwork shortly after Kami Roe gave birth in February. Utah officials told the couple that one mother must adopt the baby as a step-parent, a process the Roes say is costly, invasive and unfair.


The ruling requires Utah to declare married lesbian parents to be legal moms from birth, but it doesn't apply to male same-sex couples because they typically use a surrogate.


Similar cases have come up in Iowa and Arkansas, said family law expert Douglas NeJamie. He expects to see more, especially in states that had sought to keep laws banning same-sex marriage on the books. Utah spent $1.2 million to defend its ban on same-sex marriage, state officials have said.


Many states have similar laws governing artificial insemination that previously had not applied to same-sex unions because the rules were specific to married couples, said NeJamie, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.


"This is an easy way to actually try and discriminate against same-sex couples," he said.


The Utah case could have an effect on other pending cases, though the parental rights of same-sex couples will depend on what state laws are already on the books for heterosexual couples, he said.


Also On HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

"I Was Very, Very Happy That Stonewall Had Happened."

$
0
0
2015-07-14-1436900459-4503668-PerryBrass.jpg

I'm From Driftwood is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit archive for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer stories. New stories are posted on the site every Wednesday.

Perry Brass grew up in Savannah, Georgia, and knew he was gay at 15. After being bullied, he attempted suicide. At 17, he went to the University of Georgia where the bullying only intensified. To escape, he fled to San Francisco which he heard was "crawling with queers." After not being able to find work, he finally landed in New York City. But even NYC wasn't as welcoming as Perry had hoped:

[A] month after I arrived in the city, I was barely 19, I was actually involved in a bar raid. And it was in a bar in midtown Manhattan that was a fairly swanky bar. And I was in the back room with a guy I met who I actually knew and we were told basically to freeze because the cops were in the front room where the bar itself was and there was a raid going on. Luckily, I found a back entrance to the bar and I was with this guy that I knew and we ended up in an alley. In Midtown there these alleys between buildings, and it was pouring rain and we were able to get out on the street.


Perry couldn't seem to escape the abuse from being gay, whether it was from bullies or the cops. But one night in June, Perry was at the bar, Julius', when he heard that there was a raid down the street at Stonewall and "the girls" were fighting back. He joined the riot the very next day, finally able to push back against the abuse he had endured his whole life for being gay. Perry recalls:

I didn't have that attitude that a lot of people had which was, "Well, this is the way life is, we just have to accept it, we're given our tiny bit of what I would call our 'stylish freedom,'" in other words, if you had the money you could go to Fire Island, you could go to the Hamptons, and I knew some very stylish queens who did that and they thought this little opening of freedom was all they were going to get and they were just so happy to get it, and I didn't have that attitude. I hated that. I really hated it. So I was very, very happy that Stonewall had happened.


WATCH:



For more stories, visit I'm From Driftwood, the LGBTQ Story Archive.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Caitlyn Jenner Takes ESPYs By Storm: 'Trans People Deserve Something Vital. They Deserve Your Respect'

$
0
0

In her first public appearance since announcing her decision to transition, Caitlyn Jenner mesmerized the crowd at the Nokia Theatre in Los Angeles on Wednesday as she accepted the Arthur Ashe Courage Award at the 2015 ESPY Awards.




Jenner spoke about her own personal experience so far as a transgender woman. But she also dedicated a significant percentage of her speech to a thoughtful and touching discussion of the vast number of issues facing the larger transgender community. 


"Trans people deserve something vital. They deserve your respect," she said. "And from that respect comes a more compassionate community, a more empathetic society and a better world for all of us."


"At this very moment there are young people coming to terms with being transgender," she added at another moment, noting the high levels of bullying, homicide and suicide the transgender community must grapple with still today.  The trans community, she said, needs the American community's empathy and understanding.



Jenner admitted she had never talked with another transgender person up until very recently, in what she said was a truly educational experience. "It's been eye-opening inspiring but also frightening," she said of her overall experience since she told ABC's Diane Sawyer in April that she would be transitioning from male to female.


In a video about her experience preceding the speech, Jenner discussed about what she has learned about trans-related issues since then and how she decided over time she would become not just a trans woman, but a trans advocate.


"I came to kind of a revelation that out of all the things I have done in my life, that maybe this is my calling," she said. "To take my struggle, throw it out in front of the world, maybe I can bring understanding on this subject. It’s time that I do my best. This is an issue we can deal with. This is not something people have to die over."


Maura Mandt, the ESPYs co-executive producer, told Sports Illustrated's Richard Deitsch in the lead up to the show that Jenner's decision to transition in such a public forum "displayed enormous courage and self-acceptance."


"Bruce Jenner could have easily gone off into the sunset as this American hero and never have dealt with this publicly. Doing so took enormous courage," Mandt told Deitsch. "He was one of the greatest athletes of our time. That is what the Arthur Ashe Courage Award is about, somebody from the athletic community who has done something that transcends sport."


Jenner became a household name in 1976 when she won the men's decathlon at the 1976 Summer Olympics. But after ESPN announced the selection of Jenner in June, the network faced large amounts of backlash from those who believed there were more deserving candidates. Bob Costas called the decision "a crass exploitation play" and criticism became so loud that ESPN issued a follow-up statement several days after the initial announcement:



 The Arthur Ashe Courage Award is meant to honor individuals whose contributions transcend sports through courageous action. Sometimes that courage is demonstrated over the course of a lifetime and sometimes it is demonstrated in a single act that shines a light on an important contemporary issue. At all times, there are many worthy candidates. This year, we are proud to honor Caitlyn Jenner embracing her identity and doing so in a public way to help move forward a constructive dialogue about progress and acceptance.



The award is given to those "possessing strength in the face of adversity, courage in the face of peril and the willingness to stand up for their beliefs no matter what the cost."


 ESPN's Ramona Shelburne summed up the feelings of many on Wednesday:










-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How Scott Walker's Gay-Bashing Blew Up In His Face

$
0
0
Scott Walker thought he was playing a deft game. For a while the Wisconsin governor, running for the GOP nomination for the presidency, has been engaging in his own version of dog-whistling to homophobes, as he and the GOP struggle with the reality that the base of their party is still in the Stone Age on LGBT rights, while most Americans support equality. But this week it blew up in spectacular fashion as Walker stepped on the Ben Carson third rail and blatantly implied gay men are predators who can't be trusted around children.

Responding to a question about the Boy Scouts moving to lift the ban on adults serving as scoutmasters Walker said he was opposed because the ban helps "protect children." The implication was that gays are predators, the ugly lie that hate groups like the Family Research Council have promulgated for decades. You'd think in 2015 this kind of blatant defamation would be banished from politics. After much outrage, even from some conservatives who support equal rights for gays, like Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin, Walker ridiculously tried to walk back the comments without admitting to and apologizing for hideous, defamatory remarks.

His campaign and later he himself claimed he didn't mean "physical protection" but rather protection from the political debate itself and the controversy. And yet, when Rubin had asked his spokesperson if Walker believed children needed protecting from gay men, the spokesperson had no comment. Moreover, if he truly doesn't believe gay men are dangerous to children, and really wants the political debate to stop being a distraction for scouts, Walker would simply support allowing gay adults in the Boy Scouts.

The entire scenario seemed like part of Walker and his campaign's attempt to whip up support from anti-gay extremists, particularly in Iowa, while they've been aware of not wanting to alienate the mainstream. Walker has trotted out his sons to say they favor marriage equality, even as Walker claims he does not. And his wife, Tonette Walker, has played a sort of motherly moderator role, saying she is "torn" on the Supreme Court's decision. The thinking of his campaign seemed to be that conservatives will respect family differences and Walker's love of his family -- family first, of course -- while seeing that he's standing his ground himself on the issue.

It's an attempt to dog whistle to homophobes while still also attempting to tell moderates that he has modern people surrounding him. Walker also went to a gay relative's wedding reception, you might recall, but then said he didn't go to the actual ceremony. And after the Supreme Court's marriage equality decision, he came out for an amendment that allow states to ban marriage for gays, even as his family disagrees.

It was never been clear that this strategy would actually work with the far right, who don't want to hear that even a candidate's family might be supportive of LGBT rights. Already, Rick Santorum was attacking Walker and his wife, saying that "spouses matter," and that the fact that Walker's wife is "torn" and not on board the anti-gay agenda might sway Walker in his convictions.

So, this has been a questionable strategy from the beginning. And now, as he's trying to fire up Iowa GOP voters further, it completely came unhinged. Uttering the "protect children" term was beyond the dog whistle, and it was heard loud and clear across the political landscape and the media, bringing us back to Ben Carson's meltdowns, in which he's compared gays to pedophiles, only to backtrack but then make more anti-gay remarks.

Ever since Jeb Bush used the words "safeguard religious liberty" in response to marriage equality in Florida, we knew that gay-bashing was going to be a mainstay of GOP presidential candidates, though it would be in code words. It's encouraging to see Walker's overt pandering to bigots blew up. But when Bush used "safeguard religious liberty" in the same breadth in which he said we have to respect gay couples and the "rule of law", even though he still is opposed marriage equality, the Human Rights Campaign, the largest gay group, praised him for supposedly supporting gay couples yet didn't criticize him for the "religious liberty" code. The group rightly has been lambasting Scott Walker and his blatantly defamatory comments.

But it's the dog- whistling, like that of Bush -- and which there will surely be much more of moving forward -- that is far more dangerous. And we need to just as forcefully call it out.

Michelangelo Signorile's new book, It's Not Over: Getting Beyond Tolerance, Defeating Homophobia, and Winning True Equality, is published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 13653 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>